"Kunstpost" ProjectArtists are invited to create motifs for postcards in a limited edition.
PhotographyLukas Dostal (2013)
Anita Fuchs (2013)
Martin Bilinovac (2012)
Daniela Beranek (2012)
Alexandra Gschiel (2011)
Lupispuma (2009 / 2010)
2013, Gerlind ZeilnerTo this effect the methods are mixed (and that is what it is about ultimately - as...): The illustration of the action with the action of the illustration (the astounding thing: We observe the described action, but we do not know exactly, where we should look first, to follow the description respectively. ...), the description of a room with the marking of the hand, the exchange of local color and the mood complexion, the equalization of affect and angle of the forearm to the canvas, the memory and the condition of the pigment paste, the Want and the Should - in short: Everything as usual? Has this not always been that way? No.
Because, the true oddity of these paintings is not the in fact not comprehensible materialism of the substance (Raphael and so on.): How does something transform from something to something. And why. The blurring of the interference, the modification of the known, the attentive listening (there! in the middle softened black...), as the down tuned "content" (everything is clear: salon, kotoplayer, tea ceremony, corny joke everywhere, impressive colors, and so on.) - everyone knows that. - But why that is so plausible and odd, is the only possible question. As sloppy as well as exaggerated it would be to say: Do you know something better? Because: "Do not despise the snake because it has no horn, for who is to say, it will not become a dragon." Who the snake is, is obvious. Therefore here the dragon.